Are Passivhaus buildings healthy?
At the end of January, the Trust held an annual light-hearted New Year debate, toasting in 2018 and looking beyond energy efficiency to tackle a hot topic – Healthy buildings.
.JPG)
Are Passivhaus buildings healthy? ©Passivhaus Trust
Thanks to our speakers who shared a wealth of knowledge! The short presentations highlighted the complexity of the subject and the need for more research & evidence.
 |
 |
|
Let's get the basics right first: air quality & thermal comfort
Alex Baines, The Design Buro
- Passivhaus is a necessity for the basis of an efficient & healthy building. The healthy outcomes of adopting a high-performance building approach is compelling.
- Prioritise getting the basics right: Airtightness, thermal-bridges & ventilation. This reduces condensation, mould, damp & improves indoor air-quality.
- All buildings should adopt construction verification to ensure they perform as designed.
|
Passivhaus is not enough: material choices matter too
Chryssa Thoua, Architype/UCL
- It is important to remember that any ventilation strategy can fail.
- Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) is effected by Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC's) & persistent pollution from toxic finishing materials.
- Evidence shared from BUS surveys taken in Passivhaus & energy-efficient case studies.
|
 |
 |
|
Healthy buildings through Passivhaus & good design
Richard Dudzicki, RDA Architects
- Architecture does not have to be compromised by Passivhaus performance & quality.
- PHPP provides a simple design tool to create comfortable buildings that perform better than typical UK building regulations.
- Good design equals knowing & working with the project limitations.Lessons shared from London Passivhaus schemes.
|
Health & well-being: more than building performance
Ed Wealend, Cundall/ WELL building standard
- There is more to a healthy building than thermal comfort & air quality. Light, acoustics, beauty to name a few other considerations.
- Although Passivhaus deals with IAQ, it fails to monitor VOC's & air filteration may not protect from polluting small particulates common in large cities.
- The WELL standard doesn’t address building performance itself; It presumes designers and engineers will resolve these issues.
|
Question Time
Delegates were asked to vote on the questions below, indicating whether they were swayed one way or the other.
|
Are Passivhaus buildings healthier than equivalent typical Building Regulation buildings?
|
YES (90%)
|
|
Is achieving Passivhaus sufficient to create a healthy building?
|
NO/ Don't know (85%)
|
|
Can Passivhaus help deliver a healthy building?
|
YES (80%)
|
Thanks to London South Bank University for hosting.
Further Information
Event images: Are Passivhaus buildings healthy? ©Passivhaus Trust
UCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering - Impressions from 'Are Passivhaus Buildings Healthy?'
13th February 2018
Get involved with the UK Passivhaus community